From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 18 14:52:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3062CD2; Mon, 18 May 2015 14:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77C7912DD; Mon, 18 May 2015 14:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iebgx4 with SMTP id gx4so172659023ieb.0; Mon, 18 May 2015 07:52:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=xwEAamWIaTo4j4+ncPTGURdecOP6DbW1BEdX0Gk6oPg=; b=TB0CfNQjPVMNaZqxeetphqwnpxRNB4/qhF6uudBHChQDYhcKcNA4yVY1Y6KdcmRXSQ iam1eFuDA2CiEbcGW3wli+sVF8fkbd1JXXpQ9hd1jfcivU1FM+n8fHb+lqx7WandwYjT JIWlAF+OfUjW/gtnCMZNg9M4f97EV3GDTSKSKiORIi7eebO4oWW0TQ8vACqPWCGtnTT/ JuMkptsCIyp0xg917plCSx8J/SDW5Gr4Es+hUcfvSE468ltQuD9WF1FkRg4/bdhznHNb CsKA48RZ3fiBtJ0KEpJRRyprG1FDTGZWjZECXY1+K2KnqjSOPlo6qaetyxjp4LyF16xN tjMg== X-Received: by 10.50.126.105 with SMTP id mx9mr14830885igb.21.1431960770388; Mon, 18 May 2015 07:52:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carpeddiem@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.48.3 with HTTP; Mon, 18 May 2015 07:52:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <64FE26BD563665E5F1B3D0C8@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: <201505151825.t4FIPnxJ099637@svn.freebsd.org> <059F2C65-F92D-445C-B603-0FAE0CAF976D@gmail.com> <1431877581.91685.49.camel@freebsd.org> <7F73A915E7DF0EE8DC6149EC@atuin.in.mat.cc> <1431957864.91685.57.camel@freebsd.org> <64FE26BD563665E5F1B3D0C8@ogg.in.absolight.net> From: Ed Maste Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:52:29 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0Ni8BmUzSe7TrXis7HzJlRg3uiQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r282985 - in head/sys: arm/annapurna arm/annapurna/alpine arm/annapurna/alpine/hal arm/conf boot/fdt/dts/arm To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Ian Lepore , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , Eitan Adler , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , Garrett Cooper Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 14:52:51 -0000 On 18 May 2015 at 10:11, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > Mmmm, if this can be done only for base, and not for ports, sure, but ports > need to be able to add patches with CRLF endings, because upstream software > comes in all flavors, including CRLF files we need to be able to patch. Sure it could, we could configure it however we want. Note that we'll likely need to support CRLF in base anyway - one obvious example is test cases for CRLF handling in various tools. I'd imagine we could add an SVN keyword like fbsd:crlf=yes, along the lines of fbsd:nokeywords=yes. Do you know how common CRLF or partial CRLF files are in the ports tree? If it's only a handful that scheme could work there too.