From owner-cvs-all Mon Dec 28 13:22:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA22105 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 13:22:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp04.wxs.nl (smtp04.wxs.nl [195.121.6.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA22078; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 13:22:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from chronias.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.57.0]) by smtp04.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA383A; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 22:21:51 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199812281409.JAA25750@jade.chc-chimes.com> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 22:28:38 +0100 (CET) Organization: Ninth Circle Enterprises From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: billf@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The recent fracas involving danes, war axes and wounded dev Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG, mike@smith.net.au, nate@mt.sri.com, hasty@rah.star-gate.com Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On 28-Dec-98 billf@FreeBSD.ORG wrote: > On 27 Dec, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > %% If -core members have carte-blanche , then they should be a process for > which > %% the users, lets say, mailing list members, are allowed to expell a core > %% member. > > Finally, I don't think core members should be removed by anyone but > other core members, as far as your argument goes. Ditto... Surely it might be more democrated, but from what I have experienced, I can only amount for 1% of the information that either a JKH, SOS, PHK, Mike, Bill, or others from Core have/know. Severely starting to democrate/veto/whatever this `chain of command' is in my opinion a Bad Thing(tm) --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Life is the only Pain asmodai(at)wxs.nl we endeavour... Network/Security Specialist BSD & picoBSD: The Power to Serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message