From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 25 07:34:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F12816A58C for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from rune.pobox.com (rune.pobox.com [208.210.124.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B68A43D45 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:34:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from rune (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rune.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445017B580; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:35:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mappit.local.linnet.org (212-74-113-67.static.dsl.as9105.com [212.74.113.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED507AB38; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:35:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from brian by mappit.local.linnet.org with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1G5HR7-0001xA-8u; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:34:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:34:37 +0100 From: Brian Candler To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20060725073436.GA7477@uk.tiscali.com> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060721105813.0971ae90@lariat.net> <20060724090909.GB3412@uk.tiscali.com> <200607241609.30783.zec@icir.org> <20060724192419.GA5474@uk.tiscali.com> <44C5302D.1020807@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44C5302D.1020807@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Marko Zec , Brett Glass Subject: Re: Multiple NAT router X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:34:43 -0000 On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 01:40:13PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > an ng_ip node :-) > I've considerred it. Then all the tools like 'netstat' and 'route' need modifying to talk to a netgraph socket, but in principle I don't see why it couldn't be done. ISTM there are a zillion userland-to-kernel and kernel-to-kernel communication interfaces: - ioctl - geom - cam - netgraph - vfs - sysctl - kmem - procfs - ... Perhaps they could all be replaced by netgraph?? Regards, Brian.