From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 12:16:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D3B10656C7 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [IPv6:2a01:170:102f::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B1D8FC0A for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o89CGPxr039585; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:16:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o89CGP2D039584; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:16:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:16:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <201009091216.o89CGP2D039584@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG, dzodzo@lain.sk In-Reply-To: <20100909125921.gja50r9ov4gg4csg@lain.sk> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-x11 User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/6.4-PRERELEASE-20080904 (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.5 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:16:41 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: X11-rdp support in X.Org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG, dzodzo@lain.sk List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:16:43 -0000 dzodzo@lain.sk wrote: > In current situation i use xrdp with Xvnc successfully as well but > that's RDP falling back to VNC. I'd like to try X11-rdp assuming it > makes full use of purely RDP which would mean faster refresh rates. If > it's not available i'll just have to stick with VNC which is slower in > my view. I wouldn't call xrdp's VNC back-end a fallback. I rather think it's the normal mode of operation. The RDP back-end might not even work correctly anymore because it's not tested as well since there is no RDP-based X server anymore. I also question the assumption that the RDP back-end would be faster. Unless there are any credible benchmarks, I would not make such assumptions. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "C++ is the only current language making COBOL look good." -- Bertrand Meyer