From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 23 13:20:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA4316A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:20:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3162643D1F for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:20:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.cc.fer.hr [127.0.0.1]) by lara.cc.fer.hr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iANDK7m9010291 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:20:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Message-ID: <41A33907.5020703@fer.hr> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:20:07 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041111) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org References: <41A2488F.8030802@fer.hr> <20041122215228.J568@korben.in.tern> In-Reply-To: <20041122215228.J568@korben.in.tern> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: gvinum panic? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:20:12 -0000 Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> I'm consistently getting a system panic, trap #12 in process g_event >> when I try: > > > Are you sure that kernel (modules) and userland are in sync? Thanks, it looks like they've been unsynced for a while :( It's ok now. But, the performance is pretty bad (same with regular vinum). I tried setting up graid3 class with same parameters, and got these results: linear read (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................. 38.5 MB/s linear write (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................ 16.8 MB/s random read (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................. 41.9 MB/s random write (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................ 3.4 MB/s with raid5, gvinum or vinum, I get these: linear read (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................. 27.8 MB/s linear write (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................ 4.2 MB/s random read (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................. 44.2 MB/s random write (1024 MB file, blocks of 32768) ................ 1.9 MB/s (random reads are really random, no clustering or anything). My setup is 2 IDE channels with three discs, so one is a slave (and contains the parity disc in case of raid3). Do these numbers make sense? I'll certainly go with raid3 as it is...