From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 20 19:12:45 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA07116A41C;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:12:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.village.org (vc4-2-0-66.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE8A43D48;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:12:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KJCPd1026741;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:12:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:13:44 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20050620.131344.131702703.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: deischen@FreeBSD.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0506201507010.11816-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
References: <20050620.125452.102654445.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.43.0506201507010.11816-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk, rwatson@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a
 Soekris 4801 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:12:46 -0000

In message: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0506201507010.11816-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
            Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
: On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: 
: > In message: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0506191610170.7472-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
: >             Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
: > : How about NO_FOO[_INSTALL], where NO_FOO = no build and no install,
: > : and NO_FOO_INSTALL just prevents the install.  In theory, you could
: > : build the complete system, then use NO_FOO_INSTALL instead of rm(1).
: >
: > What's wrong with making sure that NO_FOO will work in the install
: > case to not install foo when it is set, even if it was unset in the
: > build process?
: 
: If it works or can be made to work, then nothing.

Actually, looking at the code, it would cause devd to be built, but
not installed without changes.  Since NO_GXX is defined in the above
scenario.  I've started to think about how this might be fixed.  It
really is a 'don't build this because of toolchain depends' as a
'don't build his because I don't want this feature' intertwinglement.

Warner