From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 7 19:34: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.greatbasin.net (mail.greatbasin.net [207.228.35.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CDE1512E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 19:33:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@jgl.reno.nv.us) Received: from jgl.reno.nv.us (rno-max9-51.gbis.net [207.228.62.115]) by mail.greatbasin.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA08893; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 19:33:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from danco (danco.home [10.0.0.2]) by jgl.reno.nv.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA08757; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 19:33:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@jgl.reno.nv.us) Message-ID: <010501bf5989$2c4b7ec0$0200000a@danco.home> From: "Dan O'Connor" To: "John Estess" , "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Subject: Re: 4.4 BSD forever? Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 19:09:58 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Yes, FreeBSD is going to get past 4.4. As much as I admire your idea >for its style, I think our release names are going to be selected more >on their mathematic than their asthetic values. :-) What? An operating system who's version level actually means what it says? Inconceivable! So, you're saying I can stop waiting for FreeBSD 2000 SP5 OSR2.5 SE to come out??? --Dan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message