From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 3 09:05:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8506B16A4CF; Mon, 3 May 2004 09:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (dhcp-19-33.dsl.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.19.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949BC43D31; Mon, 3 May 2004 09:05:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jk@jk.homeunix.net) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jk.homeunix.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i43G5AYi025757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 May 2004 09:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from warlock@localhost) by jk.homeunix.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i43G5ALP025756; Mon, 3 May 2004 09:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 09:05:10 -0700 From: John Kennedy To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-ID: <20040503160510.GB16961@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> References: <200405031338.i43DceZX018352@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040503151100.GA16961@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <4096660D.5090602@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4096660D.5090602@fillmore-labs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-jk-MailScanner: No infection found X-jk-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required 6, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-jk-MailScanner-From: warlock@jk.homeunix.net cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/net/openldap20-* and sendmail X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 16:05:41 -0000 On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Do you know if this affects other operating systems as well? No, I do not. At the time, it didn't even effect RELENG_4 (4.9) and I'm not having the problem at the moment with 4.10-PRERELEASE (~4/26) against the openldap22-client port. I really hope I don't end up wearing sackcloth here. (: I just managed to get my 5.2.1 test box powered up. The part where I've had problems in the past is the t-event test. I'm not seeing it at the moment with 5.2.1-p5 and openldap22-client WITH_SASL=yes. So, lots of things have changed in the month so hopefully I'm just stale.