From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 10 19:24:36 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE904D65A2 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DDRc25tF9z3JxB for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.222.3.182]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue012 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MfbwW-1kJ0v00ILw-00g2me; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 20:24:30 +0100 Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 20:24:29 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Valeri Galtsev Cc: Vasily Postnicov , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: github ports Message-Id: <20210110202429.c889dee5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20210110133605.6538dfd5@dismail.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:fRxvWiPBmcC0kpoxitb91F4BKGj9FLnLzmoLGod3f5WuTEHKMNr FVsNvs6EXLJyI1p1oOMGuZuMNpEQ98Fxn4zjivBeV4ind6VZDEwH+A3/Ss0MnDf6ho6AiV1 qpzbJOyp5rcTJtKt9YYrqLmmxQ4optSrqRaIFvVPqTcxSuuKjCk09kLoBSsLZFaOcnGPLid 1hIxnOcxU5BJym+BYJaag== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:adA1k+2pqPM=:zhQlnEbkhAOW3ndjli9Uxp FJ35f3rmH1Rn/B5GKfXTDvZUBF3egwe3ASVN4DgMM8+NPYD5vj3W52qoj32olzdiLlIN73wi2 sHsHFD+F9XQ8tiHVTZD9LfRHo5qEFfm7Z8QThSsKZ5zhrDIrekTCsd8fc6U9mDAnhZ9Q84upC SANqBj2QQ2aKy1H56cxJzJPppLDGuH6kWCIs8Q5S4sNQfJZzNdnOviihoHsbWxlryQ8a/lOqs NFHd5VfgPALcE9KAwCUmNCveeGWaibCj3A4ETdNesDre8jU1ezOdIilgXGfUUp/FgLZLSXxYI XbyWR4CyabAHRelsQEr4By0KMTIqJgWJHY5GfIF6IBK61TdSdj8jzdtE6aqobVUJF3syv+JrZ Qpg3tPhwwReerEEYkoc/MeINr/G+qkpp5hHokaOUwp/mw7ooQxPQfmMasBr5N X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DDRc25tF9z3JxB X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.126.130) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.57 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[212.227.126.130:from]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[212.227.126.130:from]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[94.222.3.182:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.966]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[212.227.126.130:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.227.126.130:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 19:24:36 -0000 On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:14:58 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Just for my education: is there any advantage in using git > like that instead of portsnap? >From my limited understanding: With portsnap, you get a snapshot, while a git update will always provide you with the most recent tree (compare the use of "freebsd-update" regarding the /usr/src tree vs. the use of former SVN checkout). The snapshot has a certain "delay" compared to the most recent version. Except... to use git, you'll have to install it, while you can use portsnap (and freebsd-update) from base. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...