From owner-cvs-all Mon Dec 28 13:35:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA24870 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 13:35:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (sj-dsl-9-129-138.dspeed.net [209.249.129.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA24865 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 13:35:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA60905; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 13:34:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199812282134.NAA60905@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The recent fracas involving danes, war axes and wounded dev In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Dec 1998 22:28:38 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 13:34:47 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > On 28-Dec-98 billf@FreeBSD.ORG wrote: > > On 27 Dec, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > %% If -core members have carte-blanche , then they should be a process for > > which > > %% the users, lets say, mailing list members, are allowed to expell a core > > %% member. > > > > Finally, I don't think core members should be removed by anyone but > > other core members, as far as your argument goes. > > Ditto... > > Surely it might be more democrated, but from what I have experienced, I can only > amount for 1% of the information that either a JKH, SOS, PHK, Mike, Bill, or > others from Core have/know. > > Severely starting to democrate/veto/whatever this `chain of command' is in my > opinion a Bad Thing(tm) > I am sure that peasants love a fascist state 8) Cheers, Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message