From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 26 13:39:07 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DE016A41A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:39:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eculp@encontacto.net)
Received: from ns2.bafirst.com (72-12-2-19.wan.networktel.net [72.12.2.19])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E16313C447
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:39:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from eculp@encontacto.net)
Received: from HOME.encontacto.net ([189.129.12.64])
	by ns2.bafirst.com with esmtp; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:39:05 -0500
	id 000D51FC.46FA60F9.00004C8F
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 80)
	by HOME.encontacto.net with local; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:39:05 -0500
	id 0004AC33.46FA60F9.00000208
Received: from dsl-189-129-12-64.prod-infinitum.com.mx
	(dsl-189-129-12-64.prod-infinitum.com.mx [189.129.12.64]) by
	intranet.encontacto.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2007
	08:39:05 -0500
Message-ID: <20070926083905.zr6eeisfswkg4c8c@intranet.encontacto.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:39:05 -0500
From: eculp@encontacto.net
To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
References: <20070925163539.pgse608uso00sw80@intranet.encontacto.net>
	<46FA5A0B.2030404@dva.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <46FA5A0B.2030404@dva.dyndns.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	DelSp="Yes";
	format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.2-cvs)
X-Originating-IP: 189.129.12.64
Subject: Re:  Re: latest firefox. linux-flashplugin and nspluginwrapper
	don't want to work together.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:39:07 -0000

Quoting "Boris S." <bst2006@dva.dyndns.org>:

> eculp@encontacto.net schrieb:
>> Also, I would really like to know if anyone has flash9 working with =20
>> somewhat reasonable stability and sound or a way to make the =20
>> server-side think that flash7 is flash8 or above?  There are more =20
>> and more sites asking for flash8+ and very few that won't work with =20
>> flash7.
>
>
> Because of the raising demand of flash9 i switched yesterday to =20
> linux-firefox-2.0.0.7 and flash9.
> This combination is much more stable and compatible than bsd-firefox =20
> with flash6 or 7 and wrapper.
> I'm using -CURRENT (AMD64) as of 21. Sept., with Linuxulator =20
> switched to "2.6.16" Mode and installed linux_base-fc6.
> I did't test sound and things like youtube didn't work. But I'm very =20
> happy now because MY often visited websites are much more useable now.

Thanks a lot Boris.  That is the same problem I'm seeing, the =20
proliferation of flash for links on websites, that really sucks but .. =20
..

I'll give all a try once I get upgraded to current on this machine.

ed
> Boris
>
>