From owner-freebsd-www Fri Jan 17 05:46:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id FAA29915 for www-outgoing; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 05:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from spunky.eos.ncsu.edu (spunky.eos.ncsu.edu [152.1.68.21]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id FAA29908 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 05:46:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nsj@localhost) by spunky.eos.ncsu.edu (8.8.4/EC19Dec96) id IAA06763 for www@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 08:46:28 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199701171346.IAA06763@spunky.eos.ncsu.edu> Subject: Re: www and doc mailing list confusion To: www@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 08:46:27 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <13614.853493987@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 17, 97 01:39:47 am Reply-To: nate@ncsu.edu From: nate@ncsu.edu (Nate Johnson) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24/POP] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk %My reasoning behind this is that it's otherwise too difficult to make %sure that web and quasi-web stuff sent to doc is being read by the web %page maintainence folks too, and most of the subject material is of %mutual interest (except for the purely web-related issues, of course, %which should still go just to www). Sounds like what I thought was happening as it stood now. Either way, it makes sense to me. Cheers, nsj -- nate@ncsu.edu / nsj@eos.ncsu.edu / nsj@FreeBSD.org