From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 28 15:56:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A997A3CA for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED93798 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-191.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.191]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47E83CFEF; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:56:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r0SFu9e1003144; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:56:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:56:09 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Ralf Mardorf" Subject: Re: Sharing a mail folder between Linux and FreeBSD Message-Id: <20130128165609.1915e7a1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20130125133346.f1484ed8.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130125150414.f262d162.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130125161215.f498f4e4.freebsd@edvax.de> <5102FE7B.4070808@gmail.com> <20130127153838.15b97613@X220.ovitrap.com> <20130127135806.4d19e997.freebsd@edvax.de> <1359333396.2513.10.camel@q> <20130128105121.0df78676@X220.ovitrap.com> <20130128153725.29761e8e.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Erich Dollansky , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:56:07 -0000 On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:58:05 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:37:25 +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > It's rather untypical to check out _only_ kernel sources without > > the "top level" content. > > For the update from 8.x to 9.1 I even didn't check out the kernel source, > this is something I did much later ;). I simply followed the FreeBSD > instructions. Perhaps it were binaries, but anyway, IIRC a kernel was > compiled?!? That would require kernel sources (and some of the "top level" files). Probably only a binary kernel update has been performed because that's the purpose of freebsd-update (versus installing from source). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...