From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 15:41:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782AE16A4C0 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfmm.org (walter.dfmm.org [209.151.233.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBB2440D1 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:40:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@dfmm.org) Received: (qmail 21282 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Sep 2003 22:40:49 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 22:40:49 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:40:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Stone X-X-Sender: jason@walter To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030929114844.GA2318@rot13.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20030929151737.D55021@walter> References: <3F781270.3020708@mikulas.com> <20030929132758.R35443@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030929114844.GA2318@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: procfs problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:41:31 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > > JM>map02# strace -p 730 > > > JM>strace: open("/proc/...", ...): No such file or directory > > > JM>trouble opening proc file > > > > > You must mount procfs. > > > > > > # fstab; > > > proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 > > > > The bi-weekly status messages have been claiming that all the common > > debugging tools except for truss have been converted to work without > > procfs, since procfs is now deprecated. Does that not include strace, or > > is there something else wrong here? > > strace is not part of FreeBSD. Oh - I didn't think that truss was either, which lead me to believe that someone had gone through ports and fixed a bunch of them. Is someone working on fixing the strace and truss ports yet? Are there other popular ports that depend on procfs? -Jason -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Freud himself was a bit of a cold fish, and one cannot avoid the suspicion that he was insufficiently fondled when he was an infant. -- Ashley Montagu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: See https://private.idealab.com/public/jason/jason.gpg iD8DBQE/eLTxswXMWWtptckRAtTdAKCiiZ1ffDqyLx0ZdT8pKEGmv1LX/wCgrTbx M3/ZMG8QAIivfTdyfm3zNWM= =s77n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----