From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 10 20:12:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C47837B401 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.informationwave.net (dipole.informationwave.net [199.74.235.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD5A43EA9 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:12:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from abe@informationwave.net) Received: by mail1.informationwave.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id BF32F4F921; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:11:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:11:14 -0400 From: abe To: Bill Fumerola Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fatal trap 12 kernel panic Message-ID: <20021011031114.GA60607@dipole.informationwave.net> References: <20021010212954.GA67855@dipole.informationwave.net> <3DA5F3BC.CD0154CF@mindspring.com> <20021010214518.GB71656@dipole.informationwave.net> <3DA5FCD2.B23CD912@mindspring.com> <20021010222545.GA82461@dipole.informationwave.net> <3DA60447.4C66C85@mindspring.com> <20021010232416.GA97757@dipole.informationwave.net> <3DA6332C.CDC30B95@mindspring.com> <20021011030207.GN80284@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021011030207.GN80284@elvis.mu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bill, Any hint as to what seems to be going on here and maybe a clue to a possible solution? Regards, Abe On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:02:07PM -0700, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:10:52PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Not to be emphatic, or anything, but IPFW has to be static. There > > is voodoo you can use to make it know about loaded modules, but I'll > > be damned if I know what it is (again, I refer you to the handbook). > > 8-). > > nope. ipfw doesn't have to be static. ipfw+ipdivert has to be static. > up until a while ago, ipfw+dummynet and ipfw+bridge had to be static, > but that was fixed and MFC'd. ipfw by itself (which includes the dynamic > rules) can be static or kldload'd. > > -- > - bill fumerola / fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org / billf@mu.org > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message