From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 29 13:25:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4246D1065670 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexanderchuranov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com (mail-ew0-f214.google.com [209.85.219.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEA18FC1A for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so833943ewy.34 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:25:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Rs/SrlRRbGEaIznK6nxOgm/Nsv6hodeyjDeECaCEnzU=; b=nCYm/UGO4eJj5dCz7ct0NAXd7SZ0bahSpbRrmopZgz1o8lP2kTbzmNblCEP+H3ZT3t G0lqCN2DVwJ51wGDeDWJUmFmGGmNN/tT/Mh4zRsX+j/cEmBSXMiHOQipHtAqoIV4Spl6 gOCX7iYdrs+TM8TQVzTfQ0WxAoJB77CEbwJV8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=JX27CEGl02Zlg8V8feizuFYHcakhFtz68kY9cZD6uXRRAp8RIGJ2QiaVG0o8wmAgg/ cd2hNk/a1EmAcsJbMhO+oTsA54QhhljbM2GfG5GsBjWVxvQ7NL5wwUoWTn1J8vR7EwNE 95AM5HmwQ2k1OjQDgTd8dBdOykD0HPrI1DVhU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.1.147 with SMTP id 19mr758625ebf.57.1264771552270; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:25:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:25:52 +0300 Message-ID: <3cb459ed1001290525m70be3e80p21b29c4e146166d4@mail.gmail.com> From: Alexander Churanov To: lev@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: subversion, mod_dav_svn and httpd dependency X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:25:54 -0000 Hi folks! Just curious, why subversion should be re-built to enable/disable MOD_DAV_SVN? Is it possible to just have another port, say subversion-mod_dav? I would then first install subversion without mod_dav_svn and install the mod_dav port when necessary without re-building subersion. For instance, boost libraries come in a single source tarball, but nevertheless if you need devel/boost-libs, you just install them and it's possible to add boost-python-libs later. Please, get me right: re-building subversion is not a big problem. I'd like to know what are the reasons for keeping subversion in a single port. Alexander Churanov