From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 00:41:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6B516A4CE for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:41:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A291A43D41 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:41:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2J0fa57074194; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:11:37 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: "Amandeep Pannu" Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:11:19 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.92 References: <44497.69.36.228.194.1110474073.squirrel@69.36.228.194> <200503181647.26346.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <41763.69.36.228.194.1111167267.squirrel@69.36.228.194> In-Reply-To: <41763.69.36.228.194.1111167267.squirrel@69.36.228.194> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1776094.bU1MFIGdQr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503191111.27191.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -5.7 () IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.0 NICs issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:41:47 -0000 --nextPart1776094.bU1MFIGdQr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 04:04, Amandeep Pannu wrote: > ifconfig em1 alias inet 205.229.165.8 netmask 255.255.255.255 > > Can I? Not sure, I would expect you'd get complaints from ARP because both NIC's a= re=20 on the same segment. > I need the other NIC for some internal operations. Errm.. Why do they need to be on the same subnet? Are they connected to the= =20 same ethernet segment? Are you trying to do bridging? ie more details please :) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1776094.bU1MFIGdQr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQBCO3U35ZPcIHs/zowRArapAJi/IUrJ380O0rLnQ0Od5beSIAsKAJ9TZjDa pfhI/Wf8eiqCweuAzqWT3g== =hMS4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1776094.bU1MFIGdQr--