From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Apr 24 23:43:47 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA16207 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 24 Apr 1995 23:43:47 -0700 Received: from ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc6.ihf.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.90.6]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA16200 ; Mon, 24 Apr 1995 23:43:44 -0700 Received: (from thomas@localhost) by ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.8/8.6.6) id IAA24781; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 08:10:55 +0200 From: Thomas Gellekum Message-Id: <199504250610.IAA24781@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Subject: Re: /usr/ports/distfiles - did I screw the pooch here? To: scott@statsci.com Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 08:10:54 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: gpalmer@cdrom.com, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, nwestfal@indigo.csci.csusb.edu, ports@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: from "Scott Blachowicz" at Apr 24, 95 08:43:01 am Organization: Institut f. Hochfrequenztechnik, RWTH Aachen X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 599 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Scott Blachowicz wrote: > > > It's probably Solaris or somesuch - Solaris seems to handle symlinks > > completely differently from BSD. > > I would think it would be personal preference of whoever configured > wu-ftpd. [...] > > Maybe the site that followed the symlinks had a -h option on the tar > command line? Or maybe I caught this thread in the middle and just > submitted a nice non-sequiter? Well, in any case, if a mirror site of wcarchive is configured that way, the symlinks will not help to keep the distfiles out of the ports directory. The mirror will have the links, too... tg