From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 8 1:45:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pebkac.owp.csus.edu (pebkac.owp.csus.edu [130.86.232.245]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA57614ECA for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 01:45:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joseph.scott@owp.csus.edu) Received: from owp.csus.edu (dialup2-124.csus.edu [130.86.24.124]) by pebkac.owp.csus.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA04080; Sat, 8 Jan 2000 01:45:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joseph.scott@owp.csus.edu) Message-ID: <3877057D.30063B1B@owp.csus.edu> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2000 01:38:05 -0800 From: Joseph Scott X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dan O'Connor" Cc: John Estess , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.4 BSD forever? References: <010501bf5989$2c4b7ec0$0200000a@danco.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dan O'Connor wrote: > > >Yes, FreeBSD is going to get past 4.4. As much as I admire your idea > >for its style, I think our release names are going to be selected more > >on their mathematic than their asthetic values. :-) > > What? An operating system who's version level actually means what it says? > Inconceivable! > > So, you're saying I can stop waiting for FreeBSD 2000 SP5 OSR2.5 SE to come > out??? > > --Dan Perhaps we should skip version 4.4 of FreeBSD out of respect for our fore fathers. ( IE: release versions 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.5 ). It would kind of feel strange to have a release version of 4.4 for FreeBSD. Joseph Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message