From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Apr 25 5: 4:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from rock.ghis.net (rock.ghis.net [209.222.164.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A161237B851; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 05:04:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: from argon.blackdawn.com (deepspace9.dcds.edu [207.231.151.2]) by rock.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA04581; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 05:04:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by argon.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC1D81919; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:03:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:03:34 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: Will Andrews , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Obsolete categories? Message-ID: <20000425080334.A313@argon.blackdawn.com> References: <20000425005946.E445@argon.blackdawn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from asami@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 02:34:55AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 02:34:55AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > * elisp > * plan9 > * offix > > Why do you think so? They are all still used and are used to identify > a collection of ports, which is exactly what a category is supposed to > do. Of course they're still used. I just question whether they are needed. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message