From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 14 19:53:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F34106564A for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@odin.blazingdot.com) Received: from odin.blazingdot.com (odin.blazingdot.com [199.48.133.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B558FC0A for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by odin.blazingdot.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0B504114248; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:53:38 +0000 From: Marcus Reid To: Tom Evans Message-ID: <20111214195337.GA90758@blazingdot.com> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Coffee-Level: nearly-fatal User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Attilio Rao , George Mitchell , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:53:39 -0000 On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:54:15PM +0000, Tom Evans wrote: > brought forward more complaints about interactivity in X (I've never > noticed this, and use a FreeBSD desktop daily). .. that was me, but I forgot to add that it almost never happens, and it can only be triggered when there are processes that want to take up 100% of the CPU running on the system along with X and friends. Don't want to spread FUD, I've been happily using FreeBSD on the desktop for a decade and ULE seems to work great. Marcus