From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 04:31:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B46F106567B for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202668FC15 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7H4Us9E032096; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:31:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q7H4Ufw5032093; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:30:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:30:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" In-Reply-To: <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org> Message-ID: References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:31:01 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 04:31:08 -0000 > OK I would say there's no pressing reason to consider ZFS for this another ZFS fanatics. it is about performance. > direction for a filesystem, at 15GB if performance ever becomes a problem a > RAID1 of SSDs with UFS would make it fly probably into the hundreds of hits > per second range. classic for ZFS and "modern things" fanatics. lots of talk about high end hardware nothing about a thread.