From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 10 13:01:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A738823 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from osx.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1438FC1B for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by osx.kode5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D17552C3C9 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:01:46 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osx.kode5.net Received: from osx.kode5.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (osx.kode5.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVM9zVuAljZU for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:01:44 +0100 (BST) Received: by osx.kode5.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3C69D52C3B8; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:01:44 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:01:44 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-texlive port Message-ID: <20121010130144.GA12086@osx.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20121010015528.GA29059@shellx.eskimo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: x-operating-system: Darwin 11.4.2 x86_64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:01:54 -0000 [ Antonio Olivares wrote on Wed 10.Oct'12 at 7:23:21 -0500 ] > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Joseph Olatt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > According to: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive > > > > I got the impression that the texlive is now available in the ports. My > > understanding was that we no longer need to use portshaker(8). I've > > updated svn of ports to r305607 and I still don't see texlive* in > > /usr/ports/print or any where in /usr/ports. > > I was under the same impression. You do need to do use portshaker to > get these ports populated. Otherwise, you will not see 'texlive-*' > ports in your ports tree. > > Best Regards, > > > Antonio > > > > > I'm running: FreeBSD 9.0 STABLE i386 > > > > Can any TeX Live / LaTeX users on the list shed some light? > > > > Thanks If you prefer, you can just use the download dvd or netinstall from the texlive website. They have provided binaries for FreeBSD. I installed the full TeX distribution myself just the other week on FreeBSD 9. So no need to use the ports system if you don't want.