From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 20 03:24:15 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E85DC16A4BF; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 03:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lexx.eunet.lv (lexx.EUnet.lv [213.21.192.212])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 21EDA43F3F; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 03:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from aivis@datatechlabs.com)
Received: from ws06 ([213.21.196.2])
	by lexx.eunet.lv (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h7KAODL4023212;
	Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:24:13 +0300 (EEST)
From: "Aivis Olsteins" <aivis@datatechlabs.com>
To: <roger@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:27:17 +0300
Message-ID: <LPBBJBKJBJHFKDNGCKMGGEHFDGAA.aivis@datatechlabs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-4"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: FreeBSD Port: gatekeeper-2.0.3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: aivis@datatechlabs.com
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:24:16 -0000

Hello,

I am writing you regarding "gnugk" port for FreeBSD. We are participating in
Gnugk project (www.gnugk.org) as FreeBSD platform maintainers.

I noticed that your gnugk port is rather old (there is 2.0.5 version
currently active) and was wondering that this is possibly because you do not
have time to do. We would like to offer our help if you wish. The only thing
we don't understand is how to make proper packages.

We have ready binaries of gnugk (tested on 4.7 and 4.8), both static and
shared.

Let me know if we can help you,

Best Regards,
Aivis Olsteins

Technical Director
e-mail: aivis@datatechlabs.com

Data Tech Labs
http://www.datatechlabs.com
phone: +371-955-55-00
fax: +371-706-53-58