From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 26 13:59:44 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9611065678;
	Mon, 26 May 2008 13:59:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from csjp@sub.vaned.net)
Received: from sub.vaned.net (sub.vaned.net [205.200.235.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDBC8FC1C;
	Mon, 26 May 2008 13:59:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from csjp@sub.vaned.net)
Received: by sub.vaned.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 84C942E1; Mon, 26 May 2008 08:44:04 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 08:44:04 -0500
From: "Christian S.J. Peron" <csjp@FreeBSD.org>
To: Michael Reifenberger <mr@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20080526134404.GA42520@sub.vaned.net>
References: <200805261157.m4QBvnpF025029@repoman.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200805261157.m4QBvnpF025029@repoman.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/jexec jexec.8 jexec.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 13:59:44 -0000

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:57:49AM +0000, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> mr          2008-05-26 11:57:49 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     usr.sbin/jexec       jexec.8 jexec.c 
>   Log:
>   Extend jexec to accept hostname or ip-number besides jail-id.
>   

Currently, the only unique part of a jail is the jail ID.  Even
then, this value can be re-used.  One of the ideas we bounced
around at the developer summit was to introduce an "administrative
name".  The discussion to implement this was surrounding auditing
and the implementation of the zonename token within audit records.
This would also solve your problem, but as it stands this modification
seems incorrect to me.