From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 14:46:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A3B1065672 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:46:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.spinella@rfc1925.net) Received: from mercy.rfc1925.net (host8-102-static.12-87-b.business.telecomitalia.it [87.12.102.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B4F8FC1C for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mercy.rfc1925.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercy.rfc1925.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BE22CEC5A for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:46:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc1925.net Received: from mercy.rfc1925.net ([127.0.0.1]) by mercy.rfc1925.net (mercy.rfc1925.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jECdnbzfL81x for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:46:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from LSD25.communicationvalley.it (unknown [194.246.127.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: a.spinella@rfc1925.net) by mercy.rfc1925.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9332B2CEC47 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:46:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EC51E4F.4090508@rfc1925.net> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:46:39 +0100 From: Alessandro Spinella User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111005 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201111161924.54727.lobo@bsd.com.br> <20111117070532.1c7c9350@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20111117070532.1c7c9350@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OT] but concerns all of us X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:46:09 -0000 On 11/17/11 13:05, Jerry wrote: > > .... First of all, because I have not fully read it....... it mean that you does *not* agree because *your* partial-ignorance? and later you state <> is there any better arguments to support that point of view? if not : *that* felon will subscribe petition. Alessandro