From owner-svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 8 15:26:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A377510656A4; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:26:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@freebsd.org) Received: from karen.lavabit.com (karen.lavabit.com [72.249.41.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FBF8FC24; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e.earth.lavabit.com (e.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.14]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E9911B897; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:06:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from 192.168.1.70 (bl17-210-129.dsl.telepac.pt [188.82.210.129]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id K3I515Q28UBF; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 09:06:16 -0600 References: <201011081331.oA8DViNq033723@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Rui Paulo Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:06:12 +0000 To: Hajimu UMEMOTO X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-stable-8@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r214984 - stable/8/lib/libproc X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:26:16 -0000 On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, >=20 >>>>>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:31:44 +0000 (UTC) >>>>>> Rui Paulo said: >=20 > rpaulo> Author: rpaulo > rpaulo> Date: Mon Nov 8 13:31:44 2010 > rpaulo> New Revision: 214984 > rpaulo> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/214984 >=20 > rpaulo> Log: > rpaulo> Don't use basename_r(). >=20 > rpaulo> Modified: > rpaulo> stable/8/lib/libproc/proc_sym.c >=20 > Shouldn't MFCing basename_r() be better rather than stopping use of > it? It's on my plans, but basename_r is not POSIX and there was a private = discussion about it a couple of weeks ago. The conclusion is that we = should adopt the Android semantics of basename_r(). Regards, -- Rui Paulo