From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 23 12:24:16 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id MAA11575 for current-outgoing; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 12:24:16 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA11567; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 12:24:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Jeff Hoffman cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: UPDATE: Imagine128 & AccelX & 950210-SNAP In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Feb 95 00:12:54 EST." Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 12:24:14 -0800 Message-ID: <11566.793571054@freefall.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Ok, for those of you who have been keeping up, I tried to re-install 2.0 > and ended up back with 950210-SNAP because my floppy didn't work with > 2.0 This time, I ftp'ed the the 950210-SNAP from scratch, and did not > use one single non-950210-SNAP file (except my X server). [FYI - either -hackers OR -current, but never both. I have adjusted the CC line. Thank you] > I run Xsetup again, choose Number9 I128 w/4MB, same resolution, same > color depth (16 colors). I load up X, and things are no longer OK. > Before I go into depth with the problems, let me say that I ran this > server under 2.0 for a while (about a month) with 0 problems. I have not > done one thing to my machine since then. It is _EXACTLY_ the same as it > was then. _Something_ that was changed between 2.0 and 950210-SNAP is > causing this problem, either directly or indirectly. I will let the > XInside people know tomorrow, as well. I'm sorry, but this is just frankly bizarre. I can't think of anything except perhaps the mmap() semantics changing (David?) that would lead to semantics like you're describing. The X server should still be communicating just fine with the board's registers and video memory under either 2.0 or 950210-SNAP, and I've certainly been running Xaccel quite happily since pre-2.0 days all the way up to post-950210-SNAP with my #9 GXE64 Pro/4MB board. It's never given me anything but flawless performance. I presume that you have, of course, tried varying resolutions, pixel depths, etc? You really will have to help us narrow this down a little more if we're to have any hope of tracking it down and fixing it. Jordan