From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 17 02:51:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696D916A470 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 02:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE8A43D5D for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 02:51:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4H2p0CG053734; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:51:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <446A8F94.6090501@samsco.org> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 20:51:00 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikhail Teterin References: <200605162028.52627.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <200605162028.52627.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrading the gdb? ETA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 02:51:26 -0000 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Hello! > > The system gdb is still at 6.1.1 and the ports are even further behind. > > Are there any plans for an upgrade? In particular, the current gdb's output of > SSE2 registers leaves much to be desired -- a problem fixed in 6.3. > > gdb-6.4 was released in December... Thanks! > > -mi Someone needs to step forward and do the work. It's a tremendous amount of work, btw. I'm very, very unhappy with the loss of functionality that we suffered at the hands of GDB6. The whole FSF development model of GDB seems like a complete trainwreck, and I certainly don't blame the people who last tried to hammer GDB into FreeBSD. Scott