From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 5 06:36:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0915C1065673 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 06:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AAD8FC15 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 06:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.76]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Eubo1f0011eYJf8A9ucAGl; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:36:10 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.9] ([70.89.202.1]) by omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Euc71f00702K3z201uc8Um; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:36:09 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <4CAAB89F.70907@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:36:07 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2C683AF7-AFA5-4D5E-8575-19455EBB142B@cwis.biz> References: <20101004221506.GA8662@polands.org> <20101005035354.GB8662@polands.org> <4CAAAC4A.5060106@boosten.org> <4CAAB89F.70907@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Matthew Seaman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Peter Boosten Subject: Re: OT: Apache as reverse SSL proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:36:11 -0000 On Oct 5, 2010, at 12:33 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Nowadays there is also the possibility of RFC2817 -- in essence you > start an ordinary HTTP session, then issue a STARTTLS command and > upgrade the connection to encrypted. This will allow name-based = virtual > hosting with TLS to work as intended. Unfortunately, last I checked, > while apache supports this, most web browsers do not. Throwing just my two bits in: Apache supports it, as does Firefox, and = nothing else (maybe Safari does...). IE definitely does not. I looked into this before opting to go multiple = static IPs at home for my webservers.=