From owner-freebsd-current  Fri May 25 11:17:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551AE37B42C
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@[206.40.252.115])
	by relay.nuxi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4PIHGl29664;
	Fri, 25 May 2001 11:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f4PIHFJ95421;
	Fri, 25 May 2001 11:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:17:14 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, Jim.Pirzyk@disney.com, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: amd feature request (Re: AMD config file question.)
Message-ID: <20010525111714.C95361@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org
References: <20010525023340.B54585@dragon.nuxi.com> <200105251356.f4PDujB40310@aldan.algebra.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200105251356.f4PDujB40310@aldan.algebra.com>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:56:42AM -0400
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:56:42AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Now that smbfs is in, can amd be used to mount smb shares? Of course, it
> can. But  can we have something  like "host" type, where  all smb-shares
> available from a  host are automaticly accessible? This may  be added to
> the host-type together  with NFS, or be made part  of a separate smbhost
> type. I'd vote for the first one, personally...

Send me a tested patch and I'll consider it.  I want to make sure you
won't be causing any problems in the generic case.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message