From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 10 7:29:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [205.252.34.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C932537B502 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 07:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [205.252.34.3]) by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86ABF2E443 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:29:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from khera@localhost) by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e9AET8r49698; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:29:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from khera) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14819.10164.426546.496414@onceler.kciLink.com> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:29:08 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipf vs. ipfw ? In-Reply-To: <20001009195054.A73207@elvis.mu.org> References: <20001008224359.R31338@speedy.gsinet> <20001009193445.T31338@speedy.gsinet> <20001009195054.A73207@elvis.mu.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "DD" == David Drum writes: DD> cpp -P $@ | grep '[a-z]' DD> The grep supresses blank lines that would otherwise confuse ipfw. DD> Last but not least, /etc/ipfw.conf looks like this: That's totally unnecessary to have that shell script. You can call cpp directly and it will not confuse ipfw at all. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: khera@kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-301-545-6996 GPG & MIME spoken here http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message