From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 24 22:28:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA20144 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 22:28:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from seidata.com (ns1.seidata.com [208.10.211.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA20044 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 22:27:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@seidata.com) Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by seidata.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA10390 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 01:28:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 01:28:26 -0500 (EST) From: Mike Reply-To: Mike To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Token Ring for FreeBSD yet? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:54 PM 2/24/98 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >Argh! Who's idea was it to start a token ring vs ethernet round of >penis-length comparison here? :-) Hmm... exactly what I was thinking. I thought this was a forum for discussion(s) of technological implementation(s) in FreeBSD, not arguments over people's personal opinions about networking protocols/technologies... Ahh, well... I've been wrong before. ;) --- Mike Hoskins Kettering University SEI Data Network Services, Inc. CS/CE Dual-Major Program mike@seidata.com hosk0094@kettering.edu http://www.seidata.com http://www.kettering.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message