From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 29 07:42:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919971065670; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:42:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580CC8FC0C; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:42:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438A27E818; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:42:26 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:42:24 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA2; KDE/4.2.4; i386; ; ) References: <1248027417.14210.110.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <200907232335.54973.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A6FF5FA.5010904@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4A6FF5FA.5010904@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907282342.25038.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" , Thomas Backman , Olivier SMEDTS , Steve Kargl , Ken Smith Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:42:28 -0000 On Tuesday 28 July 2009 23:10:50 Doug Barton wrote: > Mel Flynn wrote: > > I wrapped portmaster, since -af has the same problem when something > > screws the build (mostly plist problems and $me wanting backup packages, > > but also classics like using sudo as PM_SU_CMD and trying to reinstall > > it). > > I hate to tell you but portmaster already has the ability to restart > after an interrupted -af. See the man page regarding the -R option. Maybe that can be cleared up: -R restart an update, skipping ports already up to date. Used with -r ^^^^^^^^^^ or -f options. Yes, I should've gathered what it meant when reading "or -f options", but I never read that far. Perhaps that could read "... already done in the previous run". > So > you can do this the first time: portmaster -Daf > > Then do this the second (or more) time: portmaster -DGRaf And with the above in EXAMPLES. > The one caveat is that you don't want to run any other portmaster > commands in between since it will remove all the flags when it exits > successfully. Gotcha. Is there a reason the flags are removed if the options are not "-r or -f"? -- Mel