From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Mar 15 19: 7:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from norn.ca.eu.org (cr965240-b.abtsfd1.bc.wave.home.com [24.113.19.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3614637BCCF; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 19:07:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cpiazza@norn.ca.eu.org) Received: by norn.ca.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6F16319B6; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 19:07:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 19:07:46 -0800 From: Chris Piazza To: Kris Kennaway Cc: FreeBSD Ports , jedgar@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Serious problems with the wdm port Message-ID: <20000315190746.A9758@norn.ca.eu.org> References: <20000315173129.A5272@norn.ca.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 06:52:22PM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 06:52:22PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > The only reason I found this was because the modules I'd listed in > > /etc/pam.conf (the RIGHT place) weren't even being used. > > Nice spotting. So this looks like a general problem with the port - but am > I right that since it doesn't actually modify the pam config on FreeBSD > it's not directly a problem for us (only if someone copies the default?) Well, if you have USE_PAM it does install this to /etc/pam.d by default and uses those options. -Chris -- cpiazza@jaxon.net cpiazza@FreeBSD.org Abbotsford, BC, Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message