From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 8 00:05:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF53216A418; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 00:05:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC9513C465; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 00:05:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (207-104-43-151.starstream.net [207.104.43.151]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9803fqm014552; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:03:42 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1191799076.53229.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <1191517967.61533.122.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> <47093C60.1060603@freebsd.org> <470958B1.3060605@freebsd.org> <1191798681.967.7.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> <1191799076.53229.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Sonata Biosciences, Inc. Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:02:39 -0700 Message-Id: <1191801759.967.29.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: (minor) issues after upgrading to 2.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jahnke@sonatabio.com List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:05:21 -0000 On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 19:17 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > My test system is an i386 -CURRENT machine that I just keep upgrading. > I don't see any problems with finding help or yelp crashing on exit. I > didn't really modify any of the dot files, either. That's good to know. It seems -CURRENT is more "stable" in this case. > The 2.14 links are expected as those documents have not been updated > since then. Sheesh. This is not the fault of the FreeBSD Gnome team, of course. > Without a backtrace with full debugging symbols, I can't do much. Understood, but I have some major milestones due in the next two weeks. I just don't recompile anything when I have tight deadlines, both because of time and risk. Thereafter I can help more. Frank