From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 29 23:46:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA7816A41F for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:46:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E2A43D6D for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:46:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EhF9q-0003DU-Ea for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:45:10 +0100 Received: from gw205.f5.com ([205.229.151.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:45:10 +0100 Received: from atkin901 by gw205.f5.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:45:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Mark Atkinson Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:44:04 -0800 Lines: 74 Message-ID: References: <438C9FCF.7080405@savvis.net> <200511291741.27945.jhb@freebsd.org> <200511291804.11041.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gw205.f5.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <200511291804.11041.jhb@freebsd.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: problems with -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:46:44 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 29 November 2005 05:51 pm, Mark Atkinson wrote: > >>John Baldwin wrote: >> >>>On Tuesday 29 November 2005 05:04 pm, Mark Atkinson wrote: >>> >>>>Rainer Alves wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 11/29/05, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>dear hackers, >>>>>> >>>>>>after cvsup'ing recent current (as of yesterday evening pst) and >>>>>>building/installing new kernel/world i started having problems: >>>>>> >>>>>>problem 1: startx simply reboots my laptop. i can see x coming up, then >>>>>>after just a few seconds my laptop reboots. no window manager, no >>>>>>nothing. my laptop is a dell with some radeon video card. will provide >>>>>>more details on request. >>>>>> >>>>>>problem 2: when system is booted and filesystem is not clean fsck is >>>>>>started and checks all dirty filesystems. then boot process continues >>>>>>as usual, however root filesystem is still mounted read-only, i.e. >>>>>> >>>>>>---> /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, read-only) <--- >>>>>>devfs on /dev (devfs, local) >>>>>>/dev/ad0s1d on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates) >>>>>>/dev/ad0s1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates) >>>>>>/dev/ad0s1e on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) >>>>>>linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) >>>>>>devfs on /var/named/dev (devfs, local) >>>>>> >>>>>>so, anyone sees this as well or its just me. >>>>>> >>>>>>thanks, >>>>>>max >>>>> >>>>>Same thing here.. it's probably related to the huge DRM changes >>>>>commited yesterday by anholt@. >>>>>I'll try to enable some debugging stuff and see what's going on... >>>> >>>>I just cvsup'd to 2005.11.28.23.00.00, rebuilt and reinstalled, which >>>>should be just before the commit: >>>> >>>>anholt 2005-11-28 23:13:57 UTC >>>> >>>>and starting X still reboots my machine. I'm reverting the kernel now >>>>to 8am UTC from the 28th, and if that still fails I'm going back about 7 >>>>to 10 days. >>> >>>Hook up a serial console so you can see the panic message. Make sure >>>kdb/ddb, etc. are in your kernel so you can get a trace. >> >>the box is out and out resetting. I already have ddb, etc.. (which is >>why I noticed the LOR on so_snd earlier with the same kernel. Will >>setting up comconsole on this box really give me a panic and not reset >>with X running? > > > Yes. When X is running, we don't drop into the debugger, it just reboots. Very good to know! I'm curious why we don't dump to the dumpdev at this point however? I just finished a kernel from Nov 28 0800 UTC and no reset with comconsole. It is possible that my update to 23:00:00 caught part but not all of a big commit finished at 23:13 UTC. Now trying with the old 23:00:00 kernel... [boots.. startx] Hehe. Guess what? it's the uipc_socket panic.