From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 13:01:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E3616A4CE for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:01:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAA2043D31 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:01:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 17953 invoked by uid 513); 2 Jul 2004 13:05:51 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(-4.9/5.0):. Processed in 0.459162 secs); 02 Jul 2004 13:05:51 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 13:05:51 -0000 Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:00:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Klaus Robert Suetterlin In-Reply-To: <200407020935.i629Zl0B010122@robert2.mpe-garching.mpg.de> Message-ID: <20040702144516.M17792@pukruppa.net> References: <200407020935.i629Zl0B010122@robert2.mpe-garching.mpg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q: state of the X (as related to fbsd). X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:01:22 -0000 On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Klaus Robert Suetterlin wrote: > 1) Why should anyone (I) use the Xorg software bundle? I mean > ``really''. I mean ``today''. > > 2) Is there some kind of (in)official decision to choose one over > the other? Or is there a strong personal feeling of the X11 (and > related technology) maintainers involved? > > 3) What keeps the XFree86-4(.4.0) port update from beeing committed? These are *my* personal feelings: 1) Because this is the first serious alternative to XFree86. *Perhaps* something will work better, faster or different. 2) I hope not: GUIs belong to userland and which kind of beasts live in userland should be decided by the people who invest their time in porting them. 3) I don't know how to write ports, and if I had the time to learn it, I would start with something simplier than XFree86-4. What about you? Regards, Uli. +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+