From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 26 16:13:05 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFF1106567A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:13:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com)
Received: from server505.appriver.com (server505e.appriver.com [98.129.35.9])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87D78FC08
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:13:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Policy: GLOBAL - maxiscale.com
X-Primary: psteele@maxiscale.com
X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide
X-ALLOW: psteele@maxiscale.com ALLOWED
X-Virus-Scan: V-
X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: 
X-Country-Path: UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES->UNITED STATES
X-Note-Sending-IP: 98.129.23.14
X-Note-Reverse-DNS: ht01.exg5.exghost.com
X-Note-WHTLIST: psteele@maxiscale.com
X-Note: User Rule Hits: 
X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G179 G180 G181 G182 G186 G187 G198 G285 
X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits: 
X-Note: Mail Class: ALLOWEDSENDER
X-Note: Headers Injected
Received: from [98.129.23.14] (HELO ht01.exg5.exghost.com)
	by server505.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2)
	with ESMTPS id 30055264 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org;
	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:13:04 -0500
Received: from mbx03.exg5.exghost.com ([169.254.1.132]) by
	ht01.exg5.exghost.com ([98.129.23.14]) with mapi;
	Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:13:03 -0500
From: Peter Steele <psteele@maxiscale.com>
To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:13:02 -0500
Thread-Topic: Puzzling stack trace
Thread-Index: AcrM+W1uHCO9lvMRTqutSLLb+uuVOAABYc6Q
Message-ID: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AADF7@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com>
References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACBE@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com>
	<86iq8jl0d7.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3B5AACDB@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com>
	<201003260941.29154.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201003260941.29154.jhb@freebsd.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: Puzzling stack trace
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:13:05 -0000

>Also, you should see if=20
>__svfscanf() calls __srget().  The __svfscanf() call frame may not show up=
 in=20
>gdb if the compiler re-used the callframe from vsscanf for __svfscanf() as=
 an=20
>optimization.

I just checked--it does not call __srget()...