From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 20 19:37:38 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BA116A41C;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:37:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk)
Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk
	[212.242.113.79])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F8743D1F;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:37:37 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk)
Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000)
	id 1A5CE119E2; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:37:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:37:35 +0200
From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050620193735.GD884@zaphod.nitro.dk>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0506201515210.11816-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
	<20050620202808.N26664@fledge.watson.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kfjH4zxOES6UT95V"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050620202808.N26664@fledge.watson.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, phk@phk.freebsd.dk,
	current@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD,
	successes and nits on a Soekris 4801
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:37:38 -0000


--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2005.06.20 20:29:19 +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>=20
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>=20
> >Also, what about dynamic executables that need libstdc++, but you still=
=20
> >don't want the build tools?
>=20
> I'm trying to remember the reason NO_CXX actually exists -- I believe it'=
s=20
> because our sparc64 port didn't have working C++ for some period of time,=
=20
> so we didn't build C++ (and its dependencies).  It could well be that=20
> NO_CXX is OBE, and we can eliminate it entirely?  I.e., C++ support=20
> libraries and applications are now a basic requirement as DHCP is broken=
=20
> without them?

Actually I don't think you even need the C++ libraries (at least not
installed), since devd is linked static.

[simon@zaphod:~] grep SHARED /usr/src/sbin/devd/Makefile
NO_SHARED?=3DYES

--=20
Simon L. Nielsen

--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCtxr/h9pcDSc1mlERAta8AKCBUAOYd6cS2dEtgDHXXjrLlbObOACfW8ia
HL8V9dg0A/YUFogFpDn8M54=
=TGj3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V--