From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 18 21:41:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA04168 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 21:41:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA04158 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 21:41:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1) id E0vx4lk-0005WT-00; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 22:40:40 -0700 To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" Subject: Re: Core dumps in suid processes (again) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, gnat@frii.com In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Feb 1997 14:05:00 +1100." References: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 22:40:34 -0700 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message "Daniel O'Callaghan" writes: : Will that work with screen, where the program is setuid root but runs : (and is kill -11 able) as me? I guess I mean, does the : has-been-setuid flag keep its state even when euid==ruid? When the uid and euid are set at any time, then a flag in the proc structure gets set and you will no longer get a core dump. Warner