From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 17:06:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C972216A4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D274400E for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:06:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8U06qH65336 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:06:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:06:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030929200456.R99666-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: SCHED_ULE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:06:53 -0000 There seems to have been some regression in the interactivity of SCHED_ULE since I was last measuring it. I'll send a follow up mail when I have found and fixed the issue. Thanks, Jeff