From owner-freebsd-security Mon Nov 12 10:24:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [216.33.66.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C4C37B418 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:24:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 6ED6481D05; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:24:37 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:24:37 -0600 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Florin MANAILA Cc: BSD Subject: Re: Secure Message-ID: <20011112122437.Q89342@elvis.mu.org> References: <3BF01433.CCD4F09A@softnet.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BF01433.CCD4F09A@softnet.ro>; from florin.manaila@softnet.ro on Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 08:25:55PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Florin MANAILA [011112 12:18] wrote: > Hi all, > Question: > > How secure is FreeBSD compared with OpenBSD , NetBSD , Linux ??? FreeBSD has a strong focus on security, we do a lot of our own investigation as well as tracking and collaborating with what's going on in OpenBSD , NetBSD , Linux to make sure we're up to date and they are as well. Nowadays with full disclosure everyone is doing pretty well relatively. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message