From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 7 1:52:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from vbook.express.ru (asplinux.ru [195.133.213.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F057C37B404 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 01:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vova by vbook.express.ru with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17GFTP-0000DH-00; Fri, 07 Jun 2002 12:51:55 +0400 Subject: Re: [HELP] IPless VLAN interfaces From: "Vladimir B. " Grebenschikov To: Iasen Kostov Cc: Marko Zec , freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20020607113439.V32865-100000@shadowhand.OTEL.net> References: <20020607113439.V32865-100000@shadowhand.OTEL.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 07 Jun 2002 12:51:55 +0400 Message-Id: <1023439915.531.12.camel@vbook.express.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org =F7 Fri, 07.06.2002, =D7 12:42, Iasen Kostov =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC: > Of course I can do that and on 4.6-RC. Just a little patch in > netinet/in.c . And I wander who and why he put this "route addition check= " > when kernel tries to set host route for the interface. Before it works > perfect with just a warring. And I realy need it to be that way. I agree with you, actually we need have way to direct kernel do not add route while configure interface. =20 --=20 Vladimir B. Grebenschikov vova@sw.ru, SWsoft, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message