From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 23 23:42: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1589B15004; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 23:42:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA12006; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 00:41:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id AAA18844; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 00:42:18 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199911240742.AAA18844@harmony.village.org> To: peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au Subject: Re: FreeBSD security auditing project. Cc: Brian Fundakowski Feldman , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 24 Nov 1999 16:31:40 +1100." <99Nov24.162448est.40336@border.alcanet.com.au> References: <99Nov24.162448est.40336@border.alcanet.com.au> <99Nov24.075703est.40331@border.alcanet.com.au> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 00:42:18 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <99Nov24.162448est.40336@border.alcanet.com.au> Peter Jeremy writes: : I wasn't implying that. In fact, I believe the semantics of strncat() : put it into the `hard to use correctly' category (or maybe `very likely : to be misused'). I'd put strncat in the definitely unsafe category based on the number of bugs that I've fixed with it over the years. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message