From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 17 06:25:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B7416A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:25:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91.asp.att.net [63.240.76.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336F443D55 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:25:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (12-223-129-46.client.insightbb.com[12.223.129.46]) by sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91) with ESMTP id <20050217062517i9100k4qkqe>; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:25:17 +0000 Message-ID: <421438C7.20908@nbritton.org> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:25:11 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050202) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Kinsey References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AEC@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <42110635.3080209@nbritton.org> <268244209.20050215005013@wanadoo.fr> <42115637.6080307@nbritton.org> <42121360.2050905@daleco.biz> <4212D732.8040004@nbritton.org> <42139FC1.9030406@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <42139FC1.9030406@daleco.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 2.3: Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:25:18 -0000 Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Nikolas Britton wrote: > >> :-D that was a good one... >> >> > touch woman >> touch: woman: Permission denied >> >> Yea ever notice the sexual undertones in unix... touch, finger, >> mount, fsck, fork... :-). > > > > Well, there are some, perhaps, but also a good sense of moral > propriety. To counter your example: > > [kadmin@archangel][~] > touch woman > > Probably you weren't allowed to `touch woman` 'cuz you > weren't at $HOME. That stuff out on the road can be > dangerous ;-) > > KDK > Yes, messing around in roots home with his girl can be dangerous ;-)