From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 13 06:07:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE255C7 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x235.google.com (mail-pb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF311A0F for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id xb12so9859388pbc.26 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:07:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=GJHgUe9VXWpcy71eRx1qZoAbMbDYd37hTQS8HT+GUdk=; b=Qfy0GGTuLpGsooTm52yvsxILU+LwyLHAMJChUOr1UEwu809gC8BdR2KYWMdWzUNz0C GaeL9ZPQXq7oggJMKZxf9kh6/E4TLR8OBhZtf+Ab+RhUnKOHz6box8BpzsRc/J/8syin TkwAEOi2GnocW0WyH5x+Vwt8E1JTKta86bRd0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=GJHgUe9VXWpcy71eRx1qZoAbMbDYd37hTQS8HT+GUdk=; b=ObMPwUZ95nHBiYuOXMNI9h4L1KduJ2xu0io0kvqoTFPU8cZoV6ex7nA0Ou/M2Vb3vr eJ7HobdhAAJ+tE7JESq74Gc2i+aMlPnMJYxmYmk/vkK5SX57jAtMepdU8rXlBhiRMXKS Mzvl9BdrNEz6LYUQT7iy3Iv72YcTPohLwgzH1a4o18U+lqTuI5TIH1dlpJ7d3eFCmP7W c4TYM4LYbxpE9gUhDrzs3qBqbYQsnphPbKhPsf24ndCjW+QJyQmQ1vBTprqYx79bqZD4 PKr7cmqB2hnfoi7pUA51cwZw53MDfLRdZrHhdDoB++WVjbZOa0qw99/qQXDzKKH9LJqy /0WA== X-Received: by 10.68.230.40 with SMTP id sv8mr23014339pbc.30.1371103664897; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:07:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.70.45.33 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:07:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130613031535.4087d7f9@bsd64.grem.de> References: <20130613031535.4087d7f9@bsd64.grem.de> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:07:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Are ports supposed to build and run on 10-CURRENT? To: Michael Gmelin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQ5jZtoCPlXBYCdDTxUGsKYgZ9kH9uuj2uT3o4Wwy+GJO1n6WxEdLbux52GZx6akGOjToe Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:07:45 -0000 On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > So my question is: Are we port maintainers now really supposed to make > ports work with CURRENT? This is generally up to the maintainer; however many committers run -CURRENT and test on that by default. I would add something like .if ${OSVERSION} > ${WHEREEVERITBROKE} BROKEN= Unit tests fail .endif to the port's Makefile. -- Eitan Adler