From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 25 14: 4:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3D737B423 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:04:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Received: from DougBarton.net (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA29993; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:04:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Message-ID: <3B0EC8CF.3DE4FEA2@DougBarton.net> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:04:15 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tail -f over NFS in -stable References: <200105251815.f4PIF7242701@prism.flugsvamp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > In article you write: > > Blast from the past. This patch seemed reasonable to me at the time, but I > >notice you didn't commit it. Any reason why? The issue has just come up > >again on -questions. > > It shouldn't be needed. Ok, your explanation makes perfect sense. I followed up to the user with a little patch that'll tell him for sure if tail is trying to use kqueue or not. I was just concerned that the problem seemed to have cropped back up, but now I think that the user's problem is not in this area. Thanks, Doug -- I need someone really bad. Are you really bad? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message