From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 5 07:32:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EB71065695 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B41E8FC26 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.51]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id EvWm1f00216AWCUA2vYEc9; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:32:14 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.9] ([70.89.202.1]) by omta06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id EvYC1f00202K3z28SvYDjw; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:32:13 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 02:32:11 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <20101004221506.GA8662@polands.org> <20101005035354.GB8662@polands.org> <4CAAAC4A.5060106@boosten.org> <4CAAB89F.70907@infracaninophile.co.uk> <2C683AF7-AFA5-4D5E-8575-19455EBB142B@cwis.biz> To: Adam Vande More X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Peter Boosten Subject: Re: OT: Apache as reverse SSL proxy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:32:14 -0000 On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > >> >> On Oct 5, 2010, at 12:33 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> >>> Nowadays there is also the possibility of RFC2817 -- in essence you >>> start an ordinary HTTP session, then issue a STARTTLS command and >>> upgrade the connection to encrypted. This will allow name-based virtual >>> hosting with TLS to work as intended. Unfortunately, last I checked, >>> while apache supports this, most web browsers do not. >> >> Throwing just my two bits in: Apache supports it, as does Firefox, and >> nothing else (maybe Safari does...). >> >> IE definitely does not. I looked into this before opting to go multiple >> static IPs at home for my >> webservers._______________________________________________ >> > > IE 7+ does however support RFC 3546(SNI), which is the defacto standard for > accomplishing SSL name based vhosts. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication Only in Vista and later versions of Windows; Not XP.