From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Oct  1 10:49:10 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EF3211518E; Fri,  1 Oct 1999 10:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mjacob@feral.com)
Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo [192.67.166.79])
	by feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA17111;
	Fri, 1 Oct 1999 10:48:14 -0700
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 10:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com>
Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>,
	Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/14066: use of ssh2 as CVS_RSH breaks commiting
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910011244110.75426-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910011047320.49761-100000@beppo.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> 
> > Why   don't  you   just  say,   that   PRs  without   patches  are   NOT
> > accepted?  And  spare  the   discussions?  This  problem  involves  part
> > of  the  FreeBSD  (/usr/bin/cvs)   interacting  with  the  FreeBSD  port
> > (/usr/ports/security/ssh2). Yet, FreeBSD team  refuses to aknowledge the
> > problem has anything  to do with FreeBSD  -- the PR was  closed the next
> > day without much investigation.
> 
> I like this better:
> 
> 	CVS is vendor imported software that we didn't write nor do
> 	we maintain. SSH is a port that not only didn't we write: we
> 	don't even update or include it as part of the base system.

That said, both of these are important tools that we all use, so at the
very least we are all concerned over usability issues.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message